Check out the new dual core Athlon 64 processors!
http://www.anandtech...doc.aspx?i=2397
Athlon 64 X2's
Started by
S.W.A.T. 2.0
, Apr 25 2005 03:35 PM
7 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 25 April 2005 - 03:35 PM
#2
Posted 25 April 2005 - 03:48 PM
they arent good yet bro.... they are actually slower then 64fx current line..... waste of time.
#3
Posted 25 April 2005 - 06:00 PM
Yeah, but they tested an Opteron processor downclocked (which uses slower memory/mobo) instead of an actual A64 X2. Also, they tested what would be an equivilent of a 4400+, the fastest X2 will be 4800+. Only gripe I have is the price/performance. Looks like the FX will still edge that out.
#4
Posted 25 April 2005 - 06:05 PM
FX beats the piss out of everything, FX is just beastly.
#5
Posted 25 April 2005 - 07:10 PM
Well...yeah. For all intensive purposes the FX line is 2nd to none. Of course, I'd love to see an FX take on a dual Opteron system...but then again, not many ppl are going to spend $2000 for just the processors...
Still, the FX won't hold the throne as top dog forever...they'll be sticking with just 1 core and eventually that'll catch up to them. For the time being though, they can't be beat.
Still, the FX won't hold the throne as top dog forever...they'll be sticking with just 1 core and eventually that'll catch up to them. For the time being though, they can't be beat.
#6
Posted 25 April 2005 - 10:09 PM
I want longhorn... :27:
My CPU isn't scrap, it's windows that can't multitask for sh*t*.
My CPU isn't scrap, it's windows that can't multitask for sh*t*.
#7
Posted 25 April 2005 - 10:37 PM
if its intel, its scrap.
are u stupid or something swat? there will be duel core FX's coming out ... look at that one timeline i showed
are u stupid or something swat? there will be duel core FX's coming out ... look at that one timeline i showed
#8
Posted 25 April 2005 - 11:06 PM
It said they were leaving the FX's single core...maybe they just meant for now...I'll read it more in depth later on.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users