Graphic Card
#41
Posted 27 December 2006 - 07:59 PM
#42
Posted 27 December 2006 - 11:52 PM
drizzle has some decent advice there. That xfx 7900gs may be a good option. we set up a lan gaming joint with 21 of them and they are really happy with them.
Edited by poopsmcgee, 28 December 2006 - 12:05 AM.
#43
Posted 28 December 2006 - 01:08 AM
#44
Posted 28 December 2006 - 01:45 AM
- What makes it more limited than ASUS's warranty?only fools ( i won't bother to name them) fall for these LIMITED "life time" warranties
Your personal experience doesn't reflect the company's image. I've said it once, I'll say it again, show some proof.
I've provided links to backup my claims, where are yours? I see no reason to waste time arguing, I'll let my proof do the talking.
Edited by Iceman, 28 December 2006 - 01:48 AM.
#45
Posted 28 December 2006 - 03:47 AM
There's something I can't argue with. :Dha medel i need to write more better. I am saying don't buy either of them. And you are right. The issue I find with the OC cards is mostly heat related. The issue I have with turbocache is it just plain blows, and was a dumbf*ck idea in the firstplace. Your system mem is not made to do that kinda sh*t and turbocache should be renamed BSODcache
That aside, the primary reason to get an ATI card over nVidia ATM is to fold on it, and since none of you bastages do that... :D
Honestly, I think any of these cards (x1650's, x1800's, 7900's) will do perfectly fine for source and will probably come close to if not max out your monitor (60-80fps)... Newer games, it's hard to say. I still <3 nVidia, so I'd go wiht the 7900's unless you were getting something like a 1900xtx or 1950xtx.. (and since you don't fold I would probably still go for a higher-end nvidia)..
#46
Posted 28 December 2006 - 03:49 AM
So your saying that people we don't know talking about a company are more proof than someone we've talked to a lot around here saying the opposite? I'm confused by your argument. All I see is a bunch of video card roundups from anandtech...- What makes it more limited than ASUS's warranty?
Your personal experience doesn't reflect the company's image. I've said it once, I'll say it again, show some proof.
I've provided links to backup my claims, where are yours? I see no reason to waste time arguing, I'll let my proof do the talking.
#47
Posted 28 December 2006 - 03:55 AM
Don't think BFG is good based on my personal experience, or on anyones. You need to look at reviews, benchmarks, etc... Most of these companies only upgrade the fan and mess with the core/clock speeds. No real hardware changes are made...
Anyone who questions BFG and their cards, please, go to gaming and video card forums. Tell them you heard a company say they had to RMA over 100 BFG video cards, and now they have switched to ASUS- ask what they think about it.
Edited by Iceman, 28 December 2006 - 04:03 AM.
#48
Posted 28 December 2006 - 04:01 AM
As for most companies upgrading the fan etc. The companies pick their own memory chips/manufacturers, sometimes re-work the PCB layout, choose what brand/tolerances of caps etc. they want. They actually do a decent amount of changes after the initial run (which is usually just the reference design with a new sticker)
#49
Posted 28 December 2006 - 04:17 AM
- I looked up a couple BFG cards and didn't see anything showing that more was done than just a simple fan/heatsink/logo/OC. I never knew BFG did more to the actual hardware.As for most companies upgrading the fan etc. The companies pick their own memory chips/manufacturers, sometimes re-work the PCB layout, choose what brand/tolerances of caps etc. they want. They actually do a decent amount of changes after the initial run (which is usually just the reference design with a new sticker)
Even if they do make additional mods, my point still remains (to not just take your or my advice).
If the card was an ASUS and it failed another year after, your client wouldn't even be able to get it replaced.
Edited by Iceman, 28 December 2006 - 04:19 AM.
#50
Posted 28 December 2006 - 09:14 AM
#51
Posted 28 December 2006 - 09:18 AM
#52
Posted 28 December 2006 - 09:25 AM
$253.99-$30.00=$223.99 + tax? = poor hoon with no money... lol
Edited by Hoon, 28 December 2006 - 09:26 AM.
#53
Posted 28 December 2006 - 09:33 AM
me wants 7900gs by fxf..... lol... any donations?
$253.99-$30.00=$223.99 + tax? = poor hoon with no money... lol
hey that's a good price. (my cost on that card is 219)
why haven't you got it yet?
#54
Posted 28 December 2006 - 10:07 AM
If the card was an ASUS and it failed another year after, your client wouldn't even be able to get it replaced.
this is the last time i am responding to this annoying arguebot EVER. my point, is that the ASUS cards I sell DON'T COME BACK for repair. So it DOESN'T MATTER what their warranty is, because I never have to use it. Back to th original point. I have sent 23 cards out of the 164 sold back to BFG for RMA. Of those, about half got a new card. Some were sent back unrepaired and others claimed fixed but not.
f*ck you for making me look up how many actually came back.
#55
Posted 28 December 2006 - 11:05 AM
Wow, you actually looked it up, I thought I was expending too much effort on iceman by clicking the links to see what they actually were. :Dthis is the last time i am responding to this annoying arguebot EVER. my point, is that the ASUS cards I sell DON'T COME BACK for repair. So it DOESN'T MATTER what their warranty is, because I never have to use it. Back to th original point. I have sent 23 cards out of the 164 sold back to BFG for RMA. Of those, about half got a new card. Some were sent back unrepaired and others claimed fixed but not.
f*ck you for making me look up how many actually came back.
#56
Posted 28 December 2006 - 11:42 AM
Wow, you actually looked it up, I thought I was expending too much effort on iceman by clicking the links to see what they actually were. :D
oh i didn't bother doing that
#57
Posted 28 December 2006 - 05:06 PM
If anyone here still believes that BFG cards are crap, please, go post on other forums that are video card and gaming related. You'll see that the response you get is much similar to what I have said here.
Edited by Iceman, 28 December 2006 - 05:07 PM.
#58
Posted 28 December 2006 - 05:18 PM
#59
Posted 28 December 2006 - 05:39 PM
- If the card has the same price/performance, would you want something with a lifetime warranty and 24/7 toll free tech support? ASUS cards have 2 (sometimes 3) year warranties, no 24/7 tech support, and it isn't even toll free.which would you prefer ASUS or BFG? same price and same performance, which one would you choose?
But if poop is right (that BFG cards usually die after a year), then BFG would be a horrible choice. However, I am yet to see that this problem has affected more than just poop. I've asked for references about it, yet he is unable to provide any.
Video card and gaming forums would have a lot of information about BFG making crap cards, if what poop said is true. I'm not saying that poop didn't get X amount of bad cards, I am saying that don't let one person's experiences change your mind- you need to look at the bigger picture.
If I go buy 100 video cards, and all but 10 die, that doesn't mean that when you buy it, it will be a bad card.
http://www.google.co...lient=firefox-a
First link takes you to a post where computer builders, (with quite a few posts), all sit down and talk about the BFG cards being great.
Edited by Iceman, 28 December 2006 - 05:42 PM.
#60
Posted 28 December 2006 - 05:41 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users