Jump to content


Photo

MY NEW COMPUTER


  • Please log in to reply
56 replies to this topic

#41 youwerekilled

youwerekilled

    NegroAchievement

  • Dedicated Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 439 posts

Posted 11 May 2007 - 04:48 AM

3dmark05 scores @ 3.5 ghz, ddr2 @ 900 mhz... gettin started...

p.s. i accept your challange hatter.

Attached Files


  • 0

#42 vet.mad hatter

vet.mad hatter

    the real hatter

  • Server Admin+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 579 posts

Posted 11 May 2007 - 09:07 AM

Nice score i think the highest i got in 05 was 18'700.I know your going to beat my 06 score but i spent about 800 less so im still happy.Great job with the overclock.You should break 13'000 in 06. So until novahawk steps up you'll have the best benchmark scores.
  • 0

#43 poopsmcgee

poopsmcgee

    The Lord of You

  • Dedicated Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 589 posts

Posted 11 May 2007 - 11:13 AM

Very impressive. You got it cookin..and I do mean cookin..try to keep that b*tch cool
  • 0

#44 youwerekilled

youwerekilled

    NegroAchievement

  • Dedicated Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 439 posts

Posted 11 May 2007 - 12:30 PM

thanks guys. i had a complete system crash and many long beep mobo f*ck ups to get there. btw i wanted to ask you guys, i am Ocing my ddr2 800 @ 900 mhz with 4-4-4-12 timings. should i push it any further or is 900 good? i feel like i had my system crash yesterday because i pushed the ram to 1060... but i heard if i loosen the timings i can push it more. perhaps 5-5-5-18 @ 1000 mhz???
will increasing the speed and loosening the timings a bit=better performance?
tell me what you think.

Edited by youwerekilled, 11 May 2007 - 12:34 PM.

  • 0

#45 vet.mad hatter

vet.mad hatter

    the real hatter

  • Server Admin+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 579 posts

Posted 11 May 2007 - 01:22 PM

From what ive read with intel is 4-4-4-12@900 or5-5-5-15@1000 you'll be better at 5-5-5-15@1000 as far as performance.As for amd system's the latentcy matters more meaning youd be better with low timing vs higher clocks for performance.Also what volts was your memory at cause mine is ddr800 to get ddr1000 i need 2.2volts if i want higher i need more volts but thats the highest this board does is 2.2 so ddr1000 is the highest i can clock it.I know @4-4-4-10 whats its at right now is nice but when i push it i relax the timings to 5-5-5-15 and she's stable and performs better but i only clock that high to bench.Also ive read that board you can lock the memory @ whatever you want and overclock the cpu without increasing the memory.
  • 0

#46 youwerekilled

youwerekilled

    NegroAchievement

  • Dedicated Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 439 posts

Posted 11 May 2007 - 02:18 PM

thanks very much for the advice hatter. i used 2.2v with 5-5-5-15 @ 1000 mhz for these 3dmarks, and i put my cpu up to 3.62 ghz.
you can see all my voltages and clocks and temps at the top of every screenshot, so let me know if im f*ckin up with anything.
also should i go with 44412 @800 or 55515 @1000 for everyday use?
and what is the highest i should let my cpu temp go? after running 06, it hit 49 degrees i believe.
oh and i can independantly set fsb and dimm speeds... but that led to me destroying my computer yesterday and having to repair windows... so i think i should not try to go above 44412 @ 800 or 55515 @1000... though i kind of want to try 44412 @ 1000... maybe when crysis comes out....

Attached Files


Edited by youwerekilled, 11 May 2007 - 02:22 PM.

  • 0

#47 vet.mad hatter

vet.mad hatter

    the real hatter

  • Server Admin+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 579 posts

Posted 11 May 2007 - 02:28 PM

Isn't there a unlink mode in your bios that should seperate your memory from your cpu.

for everyday use i would try not to stress it.. like mine at 3.0 dont hurt it but then if i want 3.5 i need to up the cpu volts higher temps so only when i bench i stress it.My cpu @3.0 uses 1.30 volts idles around 35c when i up the volts to 1.425 and raise the fsb to 500 it idles at 45c so i only bench at 3.5 i also have stock intel heatsink.



Also nice score but says your settings weren't default in 06???Run it 1280x1024 default setting also if you have a installed a driver for your lcd that mite cause that just uninstall the monitor driver windows should reconize it fine.



And i noticed your temps look a little high usually the motherboard utility is 10c off so your cores are at 57cidle ouch!!!!!You need to watch that use core temp better program 100%

Edited by vet.mad hatter, 11 May 2007 - 02:35 PM.

  • 0

#48 youwerekilled

youwerekilled

    NegroAchievement

  • Dedicated Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 439 posts

Posted 11 May 2007 - 02:39 PM

yeah i just tried to run stalker and it was not stable (5 fps) so im gonna leave the dimm @ 44412 @ 900mhz 2.1v, and the cpu @ 3.25 ghz 1.4-1.45v, it runs well in these settings.
  • 0

#49 Novahawk

Novahawk

    Beast

  • Dedicated Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,896 posts

Posted 11 May 2007 - 02:39 PM

That motherboard utility is correct... it says the same thing as the bios temps..
  • 0

#50 vet.mad hatter

vet.mad hatter

    the real hatter

  • Server Admin+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 579 posts

Posted 11 May 2007 - 02:41 PM

But if you use core temp the core's are allways higher!! I know this that shows the temp of the processor not the cores and the core's are what you need to monitor cause there allways higher.


And if you dont know then shhhhhhhhhhhhh cause your a noob.

Edited by vet.mad hatter, 11 May 2007 - 02:43 PM.

  • 0

#51 Novahawk

Novahawk

    Beast

  • Dedicated Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,896 posts

Posted 11 May 2007 - 02:41 PM

my bad... thought you meant cores as in proc... could have been a little clearer.....

Edited by Novahawk, 11 May 2007 - 02:51 PM.

  • 0

#52 vet.mad hatter

vet.mad hatter

    the real hatter

  • Server Admin+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 579 posts

Posted 11 May 2007 - 02:47 PM

That means core temp is wrong then.. since you can't really have a temp more accurate than the one bios gives :wtf:

Why you posting.. read what i said the f*cking bios says nothing about your core's.Do you know what im saying do you overclock im trying to help him not fry something and your argueein something you have no clue about.


Your cpu has 3 temp monitors the chip itself the one the bios and the utility see's then each core and that what you need to watch cause there allways higher thats all.

Edited by vet.mad hatter, 11 May 2007 - 02:50 PM.

  • 0

#53 youwerekilled

youwerekilled

    NegroAchievement

  • Dedicated Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 439 posts

Posted 11 May 2007 - 02:47 PM

But if you use core temp the core's are allways higher!! I know this that shows the temp of the processor not the cores and the core's are what you need to monitor cause there allways higher.
And if you dont know then shhhhhhhhhhhhh cause your a noob.


good point.... idk what the sh*t im talkin about... so the cpu temp relates to the core temp how?

edit: 4 get it i get what you r saying... the actuall temp is 10c higher than what it displays... is this true for all temps or just cpu?

Edited by youwerekilled, 11 May 2007 - 02:52 PM.

  • 0

#54 vet.mad hatter

vet.mad hatter

    the real hatter

  • Server Admin+
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 579 posts

Posted 11 May 2007 - 02:52 PM

good point.... idk what the sh*t im talkin about... so the cpu temp relates to the core temp how?



http://www.thecooles...s.com/CoreTemp/

use that


All the other temps are correct just watch the core temp there's 2 dual core so 2 also its normal that one is higher than the other.

Edited by vet.mad hatter, 11 May 2007 - 02:56 PM.

  • 0

#55 youwerekilled

youwerekilled

    NegroAchievement

  • Dedicated Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 439 posts

Posted 11 May 2007 - 02:54 PM

http://www.thecooles...s.com/CoreTemp/

use that


cool thanks, also i did use default settings in 05, 06.... i just opened it and clicked run test... i dont think i can change the settings cause i only have the demo version.
  • 0

#56 DarkShadow

DarkShadow

    Elitist Fuck

  • Gods
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,746 posts

Posted 11 May 2007 - 03:02 PM

Did you order the arctic silver 5 and new heatsync yet?
  • 0

#57 youwerekilled

youwerekilled

    NegroAchievement

  • Dedicated Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 439 posts

Posted 13 May 2007 - 02:56 AM

new non screwy 06 scores.

and i ordered the arctic silver 5 stuff. $11 with shipping for a tube of gunk!

Attached Files


Edited by youwerekilled, 13 May 2007 - 02:58 AM.

  • 0


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users