Read, post opinions... etc
#1
Posted 02 May 2009 - 06:58 PM
So I'm kinda thinking about hosting some other stuff on the side as well, mainly CoD4, now I know a lot of you don't have it but, if cdkeys and all that weren't an issue, would you play?
aside from that, any other games that are currently out that you would like to see hosted, minus BF2/2142 and ETQW?
#2
Posted 02 May 2009 - 07:27 PM
#3
Posted 02 May 2009 - 07:49 PM
CoD4 would be good, I play that.
#4
Posted 02 May 2009 - 09:25 PM
- Hardcore
- SnD
- No Marty, Last Stand
- Standard Map Rotation
#5
Posted 02 May 2009 - 10:52 PM
Yeah, of course would have to be hardcore. No Last Stand and Marty is good, also maybe no tubes. But it would be better to have the server as a mixed modes one, not just SnD. Maybe each map switch it switches to a random mode.I would play CoD4 with this in mind..
- Hardcore
- SnD
- No Marty, Last Stand
- Standard Map Rotation
#6
Posted 02 May 2009 - 11:25 PM
Yea I like differen't modes it's just how I played CoD4, and that's the mode I'm the most familiar with. Also I like the feeling of when you kill someone, they stay dead like css.Yeah, of course would have to be hardcore. No Last Stand and Marty is good, also maybe no tubes. But it would be better to have the server as a mixed modes one, not just SnD. Maybe each map switch it switches to a random mode.
#7
Posted 03 May 2009 - 03:33 AM
I would play CoD4 with this in mind..
- Hardcore
- SnD
- No Marty, Last Stand
- Standard Map Rotation
Hardcore and SnD would be fine if the objective was to have an empty server, shit sucks.
#8
Posted 03 May 2009 - 07:08 AM
#9
Posted 03 May 2009 - 10:07 AM
Other than CoD4 i can't really think of another game that you could host a server for...
#10
Posted 03 May 2009 - 12:18 PM
#11
Posted 03 May 2009 - 01:00 PM
#12
Posted 03 May 2009 - 01:09 PM
Yea punkbuster is pretty much useless, it also gives a lot of people weird ass kicks from my experience.only downside to a cracked server would be no punkbuster, but honestly anti-cheat in CoD4 is a laugh without admins on a server anyway so it really comes down to just that.
#13
Posted 03 May 2009 - 01:27 PM
#14
Posted 03 May 2009 - 02:18 PM
Yea punkbuster is pretty much useless, it also gives a lot of people weird ass kicks from my experience.
There were so many patches for PB for BF2, and none of them fixed anything.
It doesn't matter if PB is on or not, people with paid hacks will play on servers that have Punkbuster (which is why they pay to bypass it), and Admins can pick off the rest of the hackers pretty easily.
#15
Posted 03 May 2009 - 03:11 PM
#16
Posted 03 May 2009 - 03:43 PM
Yea, it would always kick me and be like, "Your penis is to small" or some bs like that, haha.There were so many patches for PB for BF2, and none of them fixed anything.
It doesn't matter if PB is on or not, people with paid hacks will play on servers that have Punkbuster (which is why they pay to bypass it), and Admins can pick off the rest of the hackers pretty easily.
#17
Posted 04 May 2009 - 01:31 AM
Yea, it would always kick me and be like, "Your penis is to small" or some bs like that, haha.
Huh...almost like it knows, eh?
Meh...if you (the user) keep punkbuster updated, it really isnt a prob....and it would keep a popular server a lot cleaner (less responsibility on the admins). Certainly can't compare it to VAC with CS:S - though i'll admit it's soon becoming just as useless.
As for the creation of a CoD4 server, yeah i'd play on it. Though it is a bit old...certainly more life in it than CS:S, but just sayin...might be better to adopt a newer game...though as to what that could be, i have no idea. And would that lack of other options for games be the only reason that you are currently considering CoD4, Shadow?
#18
Posted 04 May 2009 - 01:41 AM
#19
Posted 04 May 2009 - 03:47 AM
f*cking word.I just want Operation Flashpoint 2.
#20
Posted 04 May 2009 - 12:52 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users