17 replies to this topic

[angrybrit]

It's a zombie flick. Too bad it's got an horrible story. 6/10.

The chick is hot though.

[angrybrit]

Land of the Dead is a rip off of Dawn of the Dead which was a kick ass movie.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Dawn of the Dead is the remake of the 1978 film.

Land of the Dead is the sequel. Both are from Romero.

[Boss Man]

SO IS LAND ANY GOOD

[DarkShadow]

anyhow, your all wrong, 28 Days Later invented the running zombies, so die please.

[XxsilverboyxX]

i thought that land of the dead and dawn of the dead were all old movies? these ones are just remakes of them so i've heard, theres 4 of them land of the dead day of the dead and dawn of the dead, and night of the living dead. well thats what i've heard about them.

[Boss Man]

shandow is right that movie is sick if u havent seen it SEE IT NOW!!!

[IWantWhiteCastle]

28 days later got terrible ratings and everyone hated it but i thought it was great

[angrybrit]

28 days later got terrible ratings and everyone hated it but i thought it was great

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

I hated it. I thought it was extremely overhyped. Damn Brits. :27:

[Aziz]

yeah, i heard it was pretty bad, but i never trust anyones word about movies or music... i should see it.

[kidcapri]

28 days later was pretty good. I saw it like five times. The movie itself isnt just about zombies its about the world in general. Watch it enough times and you will start to see the hidden meanings behind events in the movie. Yeah you should see it aziz.

[XxsilverboyxX]

I thought 28 days later was extremely bad, but thats just my opinion, but if you want to see a good movie with zombies go see Shaun of the Dead.

[tury]

Shaun of the dead was more of a comedy, but i liked it. Typical zombie (slow moving film).

28 Days later was good, the running zombies made the film a break from the norm, and what i think zombies would actually be like. It's nice that a british film made it to the box office, whether it was crap or not is a different story

Edited by tury, 02 July 2005 - 05:46 PM.

[XxsilverboyxX]

yea i agree with you, i think zombies would also run instead of just drag there feet like retards and go uuuuhhhhh, so it was better then some zombie movies i've seen but shaun of the dead is still my choice for which is better.

[yatzee squirrel]

28 days later was a terrible movie about stupid british people not worth the time in my life i wasted watching it

[Oi! Oi! Oi!]

I think Romero has completely lost it. The remake of Dawn of the Dead, 28 Days Later and Shaun of the Dead were all superior to Land of the Dead.

[CakeCutter]

I thought 28 days later was pretty good. Never seen land of the dead wanted to see it but never did, didnt know it was the sequal of dawn of the dead. also night of the living dead is a kick ass zombie movie

[Oi! Oi! Oi!]

I thought 28 days later was pretty good. Never seen land of the dead wanted to see it but never did, didnt know it was the sequal of dawn of the dead. also night of the living dead is a kick ass zombie movie

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Land is the sequel to Day of the Day, made in 1985.

[J.Pizzack]

and this is a pretty old post.....k thx