# 17486 "[net-tez]Stewie" STEAM_0:1:5341509 00:55 88 0 active
speed, aimbot. have screenshots too
hacker in office
Started by
poocrayon
, Sep 09 2007 12:35 PM
8 replies to this topic
#2
DarkShadow
-
- Gods
-
- 4,746 posts
Elitist Fuck
Posted 09 September 2007 - 01:23 PM
# 17486 "[net-tez]Stewie" STEAM_0:1:5341509 00:55 88 0 active
speed, aimbot. have screenshots too
LoL, wow you are the dumbest fucking kid ever, and for those who don't get it, wrap your mind around three words, speedhacks, aimbot, and SCREENSHOTS.
#3
$VT-c0brA
-
- Dedicated Member
-
- 1,879 posts
drunken master
Posted 09 September 2007 - 01:41 PM
lolz ..post the SCREEN SHOT of him speed haxing .....i wanna see the blur.....
kidz ftl...
kidz ftl...
#4
wondergod
-
- Dedicated Member
-
- 1,241 posts
i'm colored
Posted 09 September 2007 - 10:39 PM
wtf don't you guys know when you take a screen shot of a speed hacker they have those cartoon motion lines behind them....
AH DUH!!!
AH DUH!!!
#5
poocrayon
-
- Dedicated Member
-
- 337 posts
headpopper
Posted 17 September 2007 - 03:33 PM
wtf don't you guys know when you take a screen shot of a speed hacker they have those cartoon motion lines behind them....
AH DUH!!!
well i meant i had a screenshot of him ingame with a 34-1 score. ive tried taking demo's but i must be doing something wrong. if anyone has good instructions on taking a useful demo, i would greatly appreciate it.
#6
Jack
-
- Dedicated Member
-
- 1,998 posts
The Uncola
Posted 17 September 2007 - 04:05 PM
well i meant i had a screenshot of him ingame with a 34-1 score. ive tried taking demo's but i must be doing something wrong. if anyone has good instructions on taking a useful demo, i would greatly appreciate it.
umm, ~ "record demo_name" maybe
#7
Junnage
-
- Member
-
- 2 posts
Lurker
Posted 17 September 2007 - 05:37 PM
He's right. Now please review my demo (includes demo)
#8
hackersRgay
-
- Member
-
- 11 posts
Lurker
Posted 24 September 2007 - 06:59 AM
34 and 1? That is far from proving someone is a hacker...
OMG that guy hacks! You can't see his wall hacks on, but look at his score! OMFG =/
Hackers aren't proven guilty until a demo is recorded and has sufficient evidence. Now, if he was 100 and 1... maybe then, that would be sufficient.
OMG that guy hacks! You can't see his wall hacks on, but look at his score! OMFG =/
Hackers aren't proven guilty until a demo is recorded and has sufficient evidence. Now, if he was 100 and 1... maybe then, that would be sufficient.
#9
hackersRgay
-
- Member
-
- 11 posts
Lurker
Posted 24 September 2007 - 07:05 AM
oh and btw, sorry for the double post.. but I'll save your ass.. I already banned that fag from my servers. And have a demo as well.
If you check the console while reviewing the demo, you will see his (the hacker) steamID in it.
BTW he was using a different name on our servers. Same steam ID though.
Several demos of the guy because more than 1 person submitted them.
http://clansac.com/b...emos/chibby.dem
http://clansac.com/b...mos/chibby1.dem
http://clansac.com/b...mos/chibby7.dem
http://clansac.com/b...os/chibby71.dem
Anyway, this should get him banned LOL
Again, for those of you who don't know how to bring console up.. You press the ~ key and look at where all the steam ID's are listed. His steamID will be there. STEAM_0:1:5341509
We use this process so that no one can be wrongfully banned.
If you check the console while reviewing the demo, you will see his (the hacker) steamID in it.
BTW he was using a different name on our servers. Same steam ID though.
Several demos of the guy because more than 1 person submitted them.
http://clansac.com/b...emos/chibby.dem
http://clansac.com/b...mos/chibby1.dem
http://clansac.com/b...mos/chibby7.dem
http://clansac.com/b...os/chibby71.dem
Anyway, this should get him banned LOL
Again, for those of you who don't know how to bring console up.. You press the ~ key and look at where all the steam ID's are listed. His steamID will be there. STEAM_0:1:5341509
We use this process so that no one can be wrongfully banned.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
