
Microsoft Old and boring?
#1
Posted 27 February 2008 - 10:21 PM
#2
Posted 27 February 2008 - 10:35 PM
As in what? Operating systems? Games?
#3
Posted 28 February 2008 - 12:54 PM
#4
Posted 28 February 2008 - 01:04 PM
Everything, there programs are out dated, they fail to come out with new ideas and they love cock. Don't get me wrong Apple is just as bad, most don't realize it because they just cover up Microsoft's crap with some shine.
What revolution in MICROSOFT OFFICE are you looking for? What more can you do? Do you really want more in an OS? Hell they interfere enough in Vista, so stop trying to be innovative. Games? Hell what hasn't been done? For that matter, there are other developers creating games, not just Microsoft.
If you're talking about their recent fine for charging out the ass to create programs for their OSs then, yeah, but there's so many companies that do the same thing, but don't get the press that Microsoft does. So, yeah it's good to see a company fined for some bullshit they tried to get away with, but not anything new in the world.
#5
Posted 28 February 2008 - 05:11 PM
#6
Posted 28 February 2008 - 05:18 PM
Agreed, Vista sucks, but buy a Mac and you'll regret it. I'm not saying OSX is bad, it's just not good for what I do. The smart thing to do in your case is to 'buy' OSX and dual-boot it on your Windows machine using the OSx86 method. It's you getting a Mac without wasting money.
Oh and yes I do turn on my PC for more than gaming. Writing papers, web design, map design, browsing the internet, music, movies, TV shows, other videos, etc....
#7
Posted 28 February 2008 - 05:39 PM
If by "new look," you mean "I can't google the word 'WindowBlinds'" and by "working differently" you mean "a dock" and by different software you mean "no games" and by "limited viruses" you mean "nobody uses it" then yes, there's a switch for you.
Agreed, Vista sucks, but buy a Mac and you'll regret it. I'm not saying OSX is bad, it's just not good for what I do. The smart thing to do in your case is to 'buy' OSX and dual-boot it on your Windows machine using the OSx86 method. It's you getting a Mac without wasting money.
Oh and yes I do turn on my PC for more than gaming. Writing papers, web design, map design, browsing the internet, music, movies, TV shows, other videos, etc....
What Chris said...
Plus, years back people with Windows 98 and ME were looking at XP the EXACT SAME WAY. XP came out buggy as shit and there was no real reason to upgrade at the time. Pretty much in 1.5-2 years Vista will the standard, and when the next version of Windows comes out in 2010, people will say the exact god damn thing and I'm tired of it.
Yes Vista blows right now. But like the earlier OSs, it will improve, no doubt about it.
And if you want a MAC to LITERALLY have to no reason to boot it up, then by all means waste the $1500 dollars on it. But as it stands my little 1.6ghz AMD Turion x2, with 1 gb of ram and a GeForce Go 6150 laptop out performs my colleges Intel 2.4ghz Core 2 Duo, 6gb Ram G5s. Machines that cost them 2x as much as my laptop, without adding into the cost of the 20" widescreen apple monitors they have. Photoshop, Illustrator, InDesign, and Dreamweaver all run better on my laptop then the G5s. So, there's no use for a MAC for that. And games? None but WoW, pretty much. Music editing? Get Propellerhead. Virus protection? Download Avast! for free and pay $20 a year for Spyware doctor, and you're set. Assuming you're not a complete dumbass. Want to work differently? Rip off your right mouse button, done.
Pretty much there's plenty of motivation for me to turn on my computer, including, games, talking to friends, music, school work, reading, web design, graphic design, watching movies, and of course the all important pron.
#8
Posted 28 February 2008 - 06:40 PM
#9
Posted 28 February 2008 - 06:42 PM
#10
Posted 28 February 2008 - 06:53 PM
#11
Posted 29 February 2008 - 02:16 AM
Seriously though... there's a lot of things about my MacBook that just make it easier to use than Windows (I've been using a PC for 5 years now). Widgets are great, I can track my stock portfolio, write a to-do list, check the weather - all at once by pressing F4. The scrolling on the pad for the laptop feels great, one finger to move the mouse, 2 fingers and you can scroll without having to go to the side bar. There's just so many things about it that make it more convenient to use (unless you want to game).
And zeke... you can't really compare lab computers with your own personal computer... every lab computer runs like sh*t.
#12
Posted 29 February 2008 - 07:21 AM
Mac haters
Seriously though... there's a lot of things about my MacBook that just make it easier to use than Windows (I've been using a PC for 5 years now). Widgets are great, I can track my stock portfolio, write a to-do list, check the weather - all at once by pressing F4. The scrolling on the pad for the laptop feels great, one finger to move the mouse, 2 fingers and you can scroll without having to go to the side bar. There's just so many things about it that make it more convenient to use (unless you want to game).
And zeke... you can't really compare lab computers with your own personal computer... every lab computer runs like sh*t.
Widgets are a weak support for buying an MAC, considering I can do all the same stuff just by clicking my browser icon that brings me to my home page, cept the to-do list. Which you can still download window widgets to do the same things. And the touch pad, I can do the same thing with my laptop touch pad as well, nothing special there.
And matt, I can't help but just think you are a complete moron at this point, "wahh my OS doesn't develope a bunch of new things to keep my ADD ridden mind amused." OS are ment to run programs, download some programs to do what you want and shut the fuck up already. Seriously you're one dumb motherfucker trying to argue how an OS doesn't do anything new. An OS doesn't need to do anything new, program makers do. All an OS needs to do is run programs quickly and in a stable way.
#13
Posted 29 February 2008 - 01:41 PM
Mac haters
Seriously though... there's a lot of things about my MacBook that just make it easier to use than Windows (I've been using a PC for 5 years now). Widgets are great, I can track my stock portfolio, write a to-do list, check the weather - all at once by pressing F4. The scrolling on the pad for the laptop feels great, one finger to move the mouse, 2 fingers and you can scroll without having to go to the side bar. There's just so many things about it that make it more convenient to use (unless you want to game).
And zeke... you can't really compare lab computers with your own personal computer... every lab computer runs like sh*t.
If you want to do stuff like widgets, that comes standard in Vista with the sidebar, continuously showing just about anything you want including rss feeds etc. And as Zeke pointed out, the scroll function on the touch pad is standard for today's PC lappys as well.
There really is no reason to buy a mac.
#14
Posted 29 February 2008 - 05:18 PM
+1
P.S. - I own both operating systems and they both do what i need them to do. OMG BIG f*ckING SURPRISE!
Edited by J.Pizzack, 29 February 2008 - 05:19 PM.
#15
Posted 29 February 2008 - 06:49 PM
Also, its Mac not MAC.
This isnt a stab at you, but for someone that seems to have very stern beliefs but has basic facts wrong is somewhat disappointing.
If you have any specific Apple questions feel free to ask. I am usually not biased when talking about it.
PS: My 8800gt is coming next week. Cant wait.
Dave
**Trying to not get offensive about ignorance**
Edited by DocSeuss, 29 February 2008 - 06:51 PM.
#16
Posted 29 February 2008 - 07:43 PM
#17
Posted 29 February 2008 - 07:46 PM
Not that Apple's products are "bad..." It's just that they are extremely expensive for what you get compared to shit from other vendors.
#18
Posted 29 February 2008 - 08:48 PM
It was more the machine zeke was comparing to. A G5 isnt a specific machine, its a processor. So a machine with a G5 cannot being intel or anything else. Those ibm developed processors were quite a bit slower than any AMD/Intel chips out there.
Dave
Edited by DocSeuss, 29 February 2008 - 09:06 PM.
#19
Posted 29 February 2008 - 09:48 PM
#20
Posted 29 February 2008 - 09:57 PM
After the ram it cost ~2.9k or so.
Dave
Edited by DocSeuss, 29 February 2008 - 09:58 PM.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users