Jump to content


Photo

Well Some changes for sure.


  • Please log in to reply
25 replies to this topic

#1 DarkShadow

DarkShadow

    Elitist Fuck

  • Gods
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,746 posts

Posted 28 August 2006 - 03:45 PM

We are gonna change Restrictions on Server 1 a little bit now, Alrighty.

1 Awp per team or some scouts, dunno yet but people seem to like it.

Still No Flashes because there is no way to prevent team flashing that I know of, Most people on vent agree that it would be a good idea so once Mani is fixed we shall try it out.
  • 0

#2 Ezekiel

Ezekiel

    Defiant Little Prick

  • Demigod
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,006 posts

Posted 28 August 2006 - 04:44 PM

Dunno AWP is a little overpowered for that map. Specially in long and main hall.

Though, enabling scouts would definately work out. Since it's not an auto one hit kill, keeping everyone from using snipers.
  • 0

#3 panzey

panzey

    Combine Soldier

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 157 posts

Posted 28 August 2006 - 05:14 PM

I agree with him..the awp is to powerful and very gay...just put a couple of scouts per team and then that should be good
  • 0

#4 Billy Pumper

Billy Pumper

    Lord of the Posts

  • Dedicated Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,064 posts

Posted 28 August 2006 - 05:32 PM

i would rather not see an awps in an office server, but scouts could be fun
  • 0

#5 DarkShadow

DarkShadow

    Elitist Fuck

  • Gods
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,746 posts

Posted 28 August 2006 - 05:36 PM

kk, Shall try once mani works.
  • 0

#6 Chris82

Chris82

    Serpentis Rear Admiral

  • Server Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,720 posts

Posted 28 August 2006 - 05:58 PM

I think one awp per team is good. It's not my favorite gun for people to use, but one per team could make everyone happy. It makes AWP supporters stop whining about no AWPs and it makes anti-AWP people happy because with one, there shouldn't be a whole lot of whoring as on servers with lots of them.

With the scout, it should be unrestricted because most people use it, try to kill with it, realize that is sucks as switch to another weapon.
  • 0

#7 Tyler Durden

Tyler Durden

    Smoke Bluntz

  • Dedicated Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,531 posts

Posted 28 August 2006 - 06:04 PM

Personally I think a couple scouts per team would be alrite...but the awp is a little much. Whoever would get it on CT would just hide like a b*tch.

My two cents.
  • 0

#8 Ezekiel

Ezekiel

    Defiant Little Prick

  • Demigod
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,006 posts

Posted 28 August 2006 - 06:19 PM

Personally I think a couple scouts per team would be alrite...but the awp is a little much. Whoever would get it on CT would just hide like a b*tch.

My two cents.


Yeah, you can't put in AWPs and expect to keep even half the pace we've established on our servers. Half the time it would be the 2 awp wh*res 1v1 at the end.
  • 0

#9 ShLoNkY

ShLoNkY

    I <3 t3h Internets

  • Dedicated Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,013 posts

Posted 28 August 2006 - 06:36 PM

If you are doin scouts might as well make usage unlimited. Id prolly use one every once in awhile, but they are really no good on office anyways. I say no AWP even though I enjoy using them from time to time.......

^^ my 2 cents. :>.<:
  • 0

#10 Lost

Lost

    Lazy Canadian Lurker

  • Dedicated Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 592 posts

Posted 28 August 2006 - 07:33 PM

I agree with Schlonkster.. although scouts do promote camping for cts.. :hate:
  • 0

#11 tjhooker

tjhooker

    Combine Elite

  • Dedicated Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 437 posts

Posted 28 August 2006 - 07:39 PM

I dont think adding awps would be good... scouts maybe... im not a big fan of AWPS.. maybe just run 2 office servers one that rotates and has AWP
  • 0

#12 monster

monster

    You live on pen island

  • Dedicated Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,653 posts

Posted 28 August 2006 - 08:00 PM

Snipers = the gay.

Say goodbye to the fast paced servers.
  • 0

#13 Frag0holic

Frag0holic

    I AM DEATH INCARNATE

  • Dedicated Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,840 posts

Posted 28 August 2006 - 08:00 PM

No AWPs... and if we do add scouts admins need to be more vigilant about slaying people in the sniper rooms.
  • 0

#14 Ezekiel

Ezekiel

    Defiant Little Prick

  • Demigod
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,006 posts

Posted 28 August 2006 - 08:03 PM

Snipers = the gay.

Say goodbye to the fast paced servers.


Oh c'mon, allowing, say 2 scouts per team wouldn't be so bad. As long as sniper rooms are enforced.
  • 0

#15 monster

monster

    You live on pen island

  • Dedicated Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,653 posts

Posted 28 August 2006 - 08:40 PM

Maybe... but when is the last time you saw a guy rush stairs with a scout?


He's always the fag camping the garage or long hall.
  • 0

#16 Tyler Durden

Tyler Durden

    Smoke Bluntz

  • Dedicated Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,531 posts

Posted 28 August 2006 - 08:45 PM

Maybe... but when is the last time you saw a guy rush stairs with a scout?
He's always the fag camping the garage or long hall.

That is a very good point. This would be a little counter productive.

+1, monster.
  • 0

#17 Aziz

Aziz

    Ё-Ж-И-К

  • Dedicated Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,253 posts

Posted 28 August 2006 - 09:10 PM

So, the person is selected randomly?

Hm, when i first read your post, Shadow, i was a little concerned; however, now that i thought about it and read some replies, i concure it can add a twist to the server.

As a matter of fact i think Ts should be able to buy scouts and maybe 1 or max 2 AWPs. However, the CT team should be worked on. As CT is more of a rush and rescue objective team, they should not be allowed a leisure of sniper rifles - maybe a few scouts; i dont even know if we should make AWPs available for CTs - 1 max.
Although it will make the server more interesting, it will be MUCH more challenging for the CT team and a lot of n00bs (sorry for using that word, couldnt come up with anything else :dork: ) will always wanna be T. So, it really needs to be balanced out somehow. I really advise you to put a little thought into this; otherwise, it can cause irritation and more problems for you (admins) working with the server stability.

Just what i think.
  • 0

#18 Ezekiel

Ezekiel

    Defiant Little Prick

  • Demigod
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,006 posts

Posted 28 August 2006 - 09:29 PM

Hell, I'd rush with a scout. Though, you all know me. I'd rush with just about any weapon. As long as I rush. :weee:
  • 0

#19 Tyler Durden

Tyler Durden

    Smoke Bluntz

  • Dedicated Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,531 posts

Posted 28 August 2006 - 09:39 PM

Hell, I'd rush with a scout. Though, you all know me. I'd rush with just about any weapon. As long as I rush. :weee:

Its true. I have seen him rush with a dildo and a bottle of ky.

*gives topic back*
  • 0

#20 Ezekiel

Ezekiel

    Defiant Little Prick

  • Demigod
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,006 posts

Posted 28 August 2006 - 09:43 PM

Its true. I have seen him rush with a dildo and a bottle of ky.

*gives topic back*

*Steals topic*

That was probably the terrifying rushes of CS history. Bow legged CTs everywhere. :20:

*puts topic back*
  • 0


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users