Jump to content


Photo

I got my Dual core....


  • Please log in to reply
10 replies to this topic

#1 Bumblebee

Bumblebee

    Combine Elite

  • Dedicated Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 575 posts

Posted 21 September 2007 - 02:59 PM

In some points of the game in CS or half life 2 i get over 300 Fps. I never dip below a 70 anywere in the game. That was one of the best things ive ever bought.. hehe..

Heres the great part! The guy sent an extra 1 gig of PC2-5300 with the cpu!!!


Heres what im wondering. Is my 2 gigs of DDR 400 OCZ better than this 1 gig of Samsung PC2-5300???


Bumble
  • 0

#2 Smalls

Smalls

    Combine Zombie

  • Dedicated Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 365 posts

Posted 21 September 2007 - 03:50 PM

Wow, that is awesome. I want 300 fps :(


I get around 50 on average in office :*(
  • 0

#3 Novahawk

Novahawk

    Beast

  • Dedicated Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,896 posts

Posted 21 September 2007 - 04:37 PM

:D
  • 0

#4 Jack

Jack

    The Uncola

  • Dedicated Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,998 posts

Posted 21 September 2007 - 04:56 PM

whats 3Dmark say?
  • 0

#5 Bumblebee

Bumblebee

    Combine Elite

  • Dedicated Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 575 posts

Posted 21 September 2007 - 11:18 PM

Still says 2300.. wth... Hell the cpu scored 2300 on its own but i dont know how it compiles a score... stupid ass program is worthless and I dont care.. 139 fps avg is bad ass and i love it... so screw 3dmark. (and yes the game is on max everything on 1440X900)

Btw, I found out my 2 gigs of DDR400 OCZ ram is 20% faster than DDR 667 (1gb). I dont know if its because of the dual channel but it makes a 20fps difference in CS. Who woulda thought...


Next thing is graphics... gota wait for my army bonus to come in.


Bumble
  • 0

#6 Jack

Jack

    The Uncola

  • Dedicated Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,998 posts

Posted 22 September 2007 - 01:15 AM

so screw 3dmark.


Of course, I mean who the f*ck goes by the defacto standard in benchmarking anyway? just noobs and sh*t.
  • 0

#7 Bumblebee

Bumblebee

    Combine Elite

  • Dedicated Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 575 posts

Posted 22 September 2007 - 02:30 AM

Of course, I mean who the f*ck goes by the defacto standard in benchmarking anyway? just noobs and sh*t.




Heh.. couldnt have said it better myself. Im very happy though. Great cpu. I can do like 20 things at once too. never bogs down.
  • 0

#8 Jack

Jack

    The Uncola

  • Dedicated Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,998 posts

Posted 22 September 2007 - 02:43 AM

Of course, I mean who the f*ck goes by the defacto standard in benchmarking anyway? just noobs and sh*t.

^
(wtf, was the sarcasm really that subtle?)

Heh.. couldnt have said it better myself. Im very happy though. Great cpu. I can do like 20 things at once too. never bogs down.


  • 0

#9 Mandraque

Mandraque

    Zombie

  • Dedicated Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,818 posts

Posted 22 September 2007 - 07:54 AM

i got the sarcasm, i still think that in his case 3dmark is failing.
  • 0

#10 Novahawk

Novahawk

    Beast

  • Dedicated Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,896 posts

Posted 22 September 2007 - 09:02 AM

His score can't be 2300 if his processor score is 2300... the final score is the sum of the cpu, SM 2.0, and SM 3.0 scores.. so unless he was running it without any type of video card, there is no way he could have gotten a final score of 2300...
  • 0

#11 Bumblebee

Bumblebee

    Combine Elite

  • Dedicated Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 575 posts

Posted 22 September 2007 - 02:28 PM

His score can't be 2300 if his processor score is 2300... the final score is the sum of the cpu, SM 2.0, and SM 3.0 scores.. so unless he was running it without any type of video card, there is no way he could have gotten a final score of 2300...



Exactly....
  • 0


1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users