
30 Days Of Night
#1
Posted 15 October 2007 - 05:51 PM
#2
Posted 15 October 2007 - 07:31 PM
#3
Posted 15 October 2007 - 07:43 PM
#4
Posted 15 October 2007 - 07:58 PM
#5
Posted 15 October 2007 - 08:41 PM
I would rather experience it the way the author intended, then the over the top sh*ty Hollywood version.if there is a movie out, there is no reason to read the book.
Does anyone know what "they" are supposed to be?
Vampires.

#6
Posted 15 October 2007 - 08:59 PM
Yes it does look good. However i got the book this weekend and read it i was very disappointed.
Honestly, who in their right minds sees a movie preview and thinks, "Damn, I'm going to go read the book that movie was based on"?
#7
Posted 15 October 2007 - 09:38 PM
#8
Posted 15 October 2007 - 10:00 PM
Edited by Jack, 15 October 2007 - 10:07 PM.
#9
Posted 15 October 2007 - 10:26 PM
What? Sometimes you can get more enjoyment when reading a book. I saw The Fellowship of the Ring before I started reading the Lord of the Rings series. I'm glad that I read the books. They were a lot better than the movies. Graphic novels are something different though.
#10
Posted 15 October 2007 - 10:34 PM
#11
Posted 15 October 2007 - 11:53 PM
#12
Posted 15 October 2007 - 11:54 PM
#13
Posted 16 October 2007 - 12:03 AM
Decent CGI does not make a good movie. This movie seems to follow the same "we have decent CGI" promise I was given with Helsing.
At least Vampires had a drunken James Woods in it.
Edited by Halcomb, 16 October 2007 - 12:04 AM.
#14
Posted 16 October 2007 - 01:24 AM
Van Helsing was the corniest movie I've seen in a couple years. My ex-roommate said, "It wasn't that bad," before we saw it. I remember saying, "You son of a b*tch. A least tell me it's almost over," about half way through it.
Decent CGI does not make a good movie. This movie seems to follow the same "we have decent CGI" promise I was given with Helsing.
At least Vampires had a drunken James Woods in it.
Halcomb you vampire snob.
#15
Posted 16 October 2007 - 01:46 AM
mmmk, i guess we will all see. sorry it isn't Lost Boys 2?Van Helsing was the corniest movie I've seen in a couple years. My ex-roommate said, "It wasn't that bad," before we saw it. I remember saying, "You son of a b*tch. A least tell me it's almost over," about half way through it.
Decent CGI does not make a good movie. This movie seems to follow the same "we have decent CGI" promise I was given with Helsing.
At least Vampires had a drunken James Woods in it.
#16
Posted 16 October 2007 - 02:09 AM
mmmk, i guess we will all see. sorry it isn't Lost Boys 2?
f*ck Corey Feldman.
I can't wait for "I am Legend." So on that note, f*ck Will Smith too. A black man playing an overly white character.

#17
Posted 16 October 2007 - 02:14 AM
yeah, you're right, they should have gotten denzelf*ck Corey Feldman.
I can't wait for "I am Legend." So on that note, f*ck Will Smith too. A black man playing an overly white character.
#18
Posted 16 October 2007 - 02:18 AM
yeah, you're right, they should have gotten denzel
lulz, no. I meant the character was meant to be white, not a black guy playing an overly white role. It's an adaptation of a Vampire book set in Chicago's suburbs in the '70s now set in present day Manhattan. I guess they should have had John Stewart do it and made the character Jewish.
#19
Posted 16 October 2007 - 02:23 AM
I thought in the book they were in LA?lulz, no. I meant the character was meant to be white, not a black guy playing an overly white role. It's an adaptation of a Vampire book set in Chicago's suburbs in the '70s now set in present day Manhattan. I guess they should have had John Stewart do it and made the character Jewish.
#20
Posted 16 October 2007 - 02:31 AM
I thought in the book they were in LA?
Holy sh*t, you're right... and way to be the only other person I know to have read that book.
For some reason I always thought it mentioned Chicago. Guess it's time to reread it.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users